Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 06:40

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
watchOS 26 Adding a Smaller Yet Useful New Watch Face Setting - MacRumors
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Thank you.
How can you maintain self-control?
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Milky Way arcs over Kitt Peak National Observatory photo of the day for June 16, 2025 - Space
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
2025 Trade Deadline Outlook Series - MLB Trade Rumors
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Is the Las Vegas Grand Prix considered one of the "premier events on the Formula 1 calendar?"
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
How can someone get patrons on Patreon if they are a beginner artist?
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.